I’ve posted previously about dealing with
a moth infestation on my first day on the job at the museum. My second day on the job was memorable as
well. I’d gotten a quick look at the
collection room the previous day, but I wanted to get a closer look at the
artifacts stored there. It was partly to
ensure that the moths hadn’t infiltrated the collection room, but mostly
because I was curious about the artifacts!
So I started opening drawers. The
contents of the very first drawer I opened caused me to do a double-take
though. I had to check the label to be
certain that it was what it appeared to be.
It really was a Civil War era condom!
This condom is made of sheep or goat skin. The thin ribbon across the top was not used to tie it in place, but added stability and helped to prevent the condom from splitting. |
By the 1860s, animal skin and rubber
condoms, sometimes called “preventatives” or “French letters”, were available
for use. Typically they were used to prevent
sexually transmitted diseases. Syphilis
and gonorrhea were common in both armies during the Civil War. However, this condom was accompanied by a
circular which also touted its use for married couples as a birth control
device.
Sex was not a topic which was discussed
openly at that time, so it is interesting to note the language and euphemisms
used in the circular. You can see how
carefully he words his description, “…as
to the nature of the article, they are called CUNDUMNS, or Preventatives; they
are used for a private purpose by males when having intercourse with the
opposite sex. The object in using them
is as follows: Single young men use them
to prevent themselves from becoming diseased when having intercourse with women
of a public character…”
He continues and points out the merits of
using them as contraceptives, “…but where
I sell one for the above purpose, I sell a hundred for domestic use, for the
husband to use with his wife… Indeed,
all wives when they become acquainted with this article, they become strong
advocates for the husband to use the preventative with them, and they certainly
show their good sense in doing so, for the wife saves her own health, and can
have just as many children as they can comfortably raise, and need not have any
more than they think fit.”
Being a good salesman, he then lists the
price, “$3.00 per single paper or
dozen. Also on hand Yarners or Ticklers,
at $3.00 per dozen.” That was a bit
pricey for the time, which may explain why it is reported that sometimes condoms
were washed and reused! Surprisingly
though, they did appear to be effective at preventing the transmission of
diseases.
Displaying the condom presented some challenges. The animal skin is delicate and very prone to
damage from light, heat, and relative humidity (RH) at both ends of the
spectrum. A high RH can promote the
growth of mold or mildew, while a low RH can dry out the skin and cause it to
shrink or crack. I had to ensure that
the conditions in its display would be appropriate for it.
There was also some apprehension about the
public’s reaction to a condom on display.
I had several conversations with the museum’s director about the pros
and cons of displaying it, and how to most appropriately display it. In the meantime, it went out on short-term loans
twice, which gave us a chance to gauge the reaction to it. The displays in both venues, Arlington House,
the Robert E. Lee Memorial in Arlington, VA, and the National Civil War Museum
in Harrisburg, PA, had positive reviews.
Ultimately, we felt that that the condom
did help to tell the story of the Civil War soldiers, and was in line with the
museum’s mission of preserving the legacy of Civil War medical innovation. We did put it in one of the higher cases
though, so that it is not in obvious view of our youngest museum visitors.
So I guess the lesson this week is to be
careful which drawer you open!
Photos courtesy of the National
Museum of Civil War Medicine, except where otherwise noted.
There should be no reticence about its display, and no shame in younger viewership. This is a discussion of safe sex 150 years ago. It's wonderful. It's something of which to be proud both now and historically. A lack of discussion spreads disease and infants.
ReplyDelete